CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Random WayPoint Mobility Model based Performance Estimation of MANET in terms of Average End to End Delay, Jitter and Throughput for CBR Application

by M.k. Pandey, Sonika Kandari
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 106 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: M.k. Pandey, Sonika Kandari
10.5120/18497-9562

M.k. Pandey, Sonika Kandari . Random WayPoint Mobility Model based Performance Estimation of MANET in terms of Average End to End Delay, Jitter and Throughput for CBR Application. International Journal of Computer Applications. 106, 3 ( November 2014), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/18497-9562

@article{ 10.5120/18497-9562,
author = { M.k. Pandey, Sonika Kandari },
title = { Random WayPoint Mobility Model based Performance Estimation of MANET in terms of Average End to End Delay, Jitter and Throughput for CBR Application },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2014 },
volume = { 106 },
number = { 3 },
month = { November },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume106/number3/18497-9562/ },
doi = { 10.5120/18497-9562 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:38:22.845176+05:30
%A M.k. Pandey
%A Sonika Kandari
%T Random WayPoint Mobility Model based Performance Estimation of MANET in terms of Average End to End Delay, Jitter and Throughput for CBR Application
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 106
%N 3
%P 1-7
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper, we are configuring an Adhoc mode scenario using QualNet as a Simulation tool to study impact of Random Waypoint mobility on QoS issues in MANET like Average end-to-end delay, jitter and throughput by varying number of nodes within a subnet. Different sets of reading were taken for six cases with varying number of nodes from 7 to 100 using CBR traffic type. We found that Random WayPoint Mobility Model works well with MANETs of large number of nodes as well, as the highest throughput is recorded for sixth case with 100 number of nodes. We conclude that Random WayPoint model with CBR traffic gives maximum throughput.

References
  1. Bettstetter, C. and Wagner, C. 2002. The Spatial Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Model. In Proceedings of First German Workshop Mobile Ad Hoc Networks.
  2. Bettstetter, C. , Hartenstein,H. and Perez-Costa 2004. Stochastic Properties of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model. Wireless Networks. 10(5), 555-567.
  3. Bettstetter, C. and Krause, O. 2001. On Border Effects in Modeling and Simulation of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conf. on Mobile and Wireless Communication and Networks (MWCN).
  4. Blough, D. M , Resta, G. and Santi, P. 2004. A Statistical Analysis of the Long-Run Node Spatial Distribution in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Wireless Networks. 10, 555-567.
  5. Bettstetter, C. Resta, G. and Santi, P. 2003. The Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Trans. On Mobile Computing. 2(3), 257-269.
  6. Garetto, M. and Leonardi, E. 2006. Analysis of Random Mobility Models with PDEs. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc, 73-84.
  7. Hyytia E. , Lassila P. and Virtamo, J. 2006. Spatial Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model with Applications. IEEE Trans. On Mobile Computing. 5(6), 680-694.
  8. Bettstetter,C. 2001. Mobility Modeling in Wireless Networks: Categorization, Smooth Movement, and Border Effects. ACM Mobile Comp. and Comm. Review. 5(3). .
  9. Bettstetter, C. Resta, G. and Santi, P. 2002. A Statistical Analysis of the Long-Run Node Spatial Distribution in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. In Proceedings of ACM Int'l Workshop Modeling, Analysis, and Simulations of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM).
  10. Royer,E. M , Melliar-Smith, P. M and Moser, L. E. 2001. An Analysis of the Optimum Node Density for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks. In Proceedings of . IEEE International Conf. Comm. (ICC).
  11. Yoon, J. , Liu, M. and Noble, B. 2003. Random Waypoint considered Harmful. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom.
  12. Maurya, Ashish K, Singh, Dinesh and Kumar, Ajeet 2013. Performance Comparison of DSR, OLSR and FSR Routing Protocols in MANET Using Random Waypoint Mobility Model. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering 3(5), 440-443.
  13. Satya Sravani, B. , Prabhakar Rao, B. , Roopa Devi, B. 2014. Estimating the Performance Differentials of Different Protocols with varying Data Traffic. 3(7), 10827-10834.
  14. Hong, X. , Gerla, M. , Pei, G. and Chiang, C. C. 1999. A Group Mobility Model for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In Proceeding of ACM International Workshop Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM).
  15. Scalable Network Technology, QualNet 5. 0 Simulator. Website:http://www. scalable-networks. com.
  16. Corson S. ,Macker J. 1999. Mobile ad hoc networking(MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations. IETF RFC 2501.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET mobility Random WayPoint model Ad hoc scenario simulation QualNet CBR.

Powered by PhDFocusTM