CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Comparison of BFO and Back-Propagation Neural Network for Isolated Word Recognition

by Pushpa Rani, Parwinder Pal Singh
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 105 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Pushpa Rani, Parwinder Pal Singh
10.5120/18407-9683

Pushpa Rani, Parwinder Pal Singh . Comparison of BFO and Back-Propagation Neural Network for Isolated Word Recognition. International Journal of Computer Applications. 105, 9 ( November 2014), 30-33. DOI=10.5120/18407-9683

@article{ 10.5120/18407-9683,
author = { Pushpa Rani, Parwinder Pal Singh },
title = { Comparison of BFO and Back-Propagation Neural Network for Isolated Word Recognition },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2014 },
volume = { 105 },
number = { 9 },
month = { November },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 30-33 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume105/number9/18407-9683/ },
doi = { 10.5120/18407-9683 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:37:17.770174+05:30
%A Pushpa Rani
%A Parwinder Pal Singh
%T Comparison of BFO and Back-Propagation Neural Network for Isolated Word Recognition
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 105
%N 9
%P 30-33
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper provides comparison between BPNN and BFO for isolated word recognition in English language. In this paper, eleven English words were recorded from ten speakers including both male and female and have been recognized. The features of these spoken words were extracted using Mel Frequency Cepstral coefficient algorithm. Classification is done using back propagation neural network (BPNN) and bacterial foraging optimization algorithm (BFO). In an output we get meaning of that English spoken word in Hindi. This Hindi meaning is also a voice sample. Thus our input is a voice sample and our output is also a voice sample. All this implementation is carried out in Matlab platform. The current research work has successfully compared two algorithms on the basis of their performance namely BPNN and BFO. The research work has analyzed that BFO provides a better accuracy, varying from 15 to 20% more accurate than BPNN.

References
  1. M. Sher, N. Ahmad, M. Sher, "TESPAR Feature Based Isolated Word Speaker Recognition System" Proceeding of the 18th International Conference on Automation & Computing, 2012.
  2. W. Gevaert, G Tsenov, V Mladenov, "Neural Networks used for Speech Recognition" Journal of Automatic Control, Vol. 20, Issue. 7, 2010.
  3. A. Hossain, M. Rahman, U Prodhan, F. khan, "Implementation Of Back-Propagation Neural Network For Isolated Bangla Speech Recognition", International Journal of Information sciences and techniques(IJIST), Vol. 3, Issue. 4, 2013.
  4. N. Srivastava, H. dev, S. Abbas, "Speech Recognition using MFCC and Neural Networks", International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), 2012.
  5. C. Ittichaichareon. S. Suksri, T. Yingthawornsuk, "Speech recognition using MFCC", International Conference on Computer Graphics, Simulation and Modeling (ICGSM),2012.
  6. P. Dalmiya, S. Dharun, P. Rajesh, "An Efficient Method for Tamil speech Recognition using MFCC and DTW for Mobile Applications", Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), 2013.
  7. C. Sajjan, C. Vijaya, "Comparison of DTW and HMM for Isolated Word Recognition", Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (IEEE), 2012.
  8. L. Muda, M. Begam, I. Elamvazuthi, "Voice Recognition Algorithms using Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) Techniques", Journal of Computing, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, 2010.
  9. A. Seddik, M. Adawy, A. Shahin, "A Computer- Aided Speech Disorders Correction System for Arabic Language", 2nd International Conference on Advance in Biomedical Engineering (IEEE)", 2013.
  10. C. Yang, W. Yang, S. Wang, "Based on Artificial Neural Networks for Voice Recognition Word Segment", IEEE, 2011.
  11. K. Darabkh, A. Khalifeh, B. Bathech, S. Sabah, "Efficient DTW- Based Speech Recognition System for Isolated Words of Arabic Language", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol. 7, 2013.
  12. D. Paul, R. Parekh, "Automated Speech Recognition Of Isolated Words using Neural Networks", International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), Vol. 3, Issue. 6, 2011.
  13. B. Das, R. Parekh, "Recognition of Isolated Words using Features based on LPC, MFCC, ZCR and STE, with neural Network Classifier", International Journal of Modern Engineering research (IJMER), Vol. 2, Issue. 3, pp-854-858, 2012.
  14. I. Al-Hadi, S. Hashim, "Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm For Neural Network Learning Enhancement", International Journal of Innovative Computing, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Bacterial Foraging optimization MFCC Neural networks BPNN Speech recognition.