CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Software Requirement Engineering Risk Prediction Model

by Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 102 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade
10.5120/17784-8545

Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade . Software Requirement Engineering Risk Prediction Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 102, 2 ( September 2014), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/17784-8545

@article{ 10.5120/17784-8545,
author = { Shruti Patil, Roshani Ade },
title = { Software Requirement Engineering Risk Prediction Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2014 },
volume = { 102 },
number = { 2 },
month = { September },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume102/number2/17784-8545/ },
doi = { 10.5120/17784-8545 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:32:03.331818+05:30
%A Shruti Patil
%A Roshani Ade
%T Software Requirement Engineering Risk Prediction Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 102
%N 2
%P 1-6
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Analysis of many software program assignments from 2011 through 2014 shows interesting patterns. When you compare large assignments that have efficiently attained their own cost as well as schedule quotes versus the ones that ran delayed, ended up over spending budget, or maybe ended up, half a dozen popular difficulties ended up noticed: weak requirement analysis and management, weak cost calculating, weak handling of requirement change requests, weak milestone monitoring as well as requirement gold plating habit. By comparison, prosperous local software program assignments tended to be much better than on-site software development and management. Maybe the most interesting part of most of these many problem areas can be like everyone is coordinating project management instead of using technical focus. Author focused over the impact of software requirement change requests and requirement gold plating while dealing with on-site project assignments. Author also evaluated new algorithmic model to avoid global software engineering requirement failure, which in turn curtails the estimated time and budget with client satisfaction.

References
  1. Lavrischeva, Ekaterina, and Alexei Ostrovski. "New Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering for Development Applications and E-Learning. " Journal of Software Engineering and Applications 6 (2013): 34.
  2. Alves, Lus M. , Pedro Ribeiro, and Ricardo J. Machado. "Project-Based Learning: An Environment to Prepare IT. " Overcoming Challenges in Software Engineering Education: Delivering Non-Technical Knowledge and Skills (2014): 230.
  3. Moorthy, Jayaletchumi Sambantha, Suhaimi bin Ibrahim, and Mohd Naz'ri Mahrin. "Developing Usable Software Product Using Usability Risk Assessment Model. " International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications (IJDIWC) 4. 1 (2014): 95-102.
  4. VALENCIA, Luis Eduardo PELEZ, Lorena CARDONA BENJUMEA, and T. O. R. O. Alonso. " Relacin entre la carta del proyecto del PMBOK (PMI) y SQA [The relationship between the Project Charter of PMBOK (PMI) and SQA]. " Ventana Informtica 29 (2014).
  5. Zhan, Dechen, Lanshun Nie, and Xiaofei Xu. "Computational Thinking and Its Impact on Software Engineering Education. " Software Engineering Education for a Global E-Service Economy. Springer International Publishing, 2014. 29-40.
  6. Ardis, Mark, et al. "Recent Trends in Graduate Software Engineering. " Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE and T), 2013 IEEE 26th Conference on. IEEE, 2013.
  7. Crowston, Kevin, et al. "Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. " ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 44. 2 (2012): 7.
  8. Naik, Radhika. "Software Risk Management. " International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences 3. 1 (2013).
  9. McManus, John. Risk management in software development projects. Routledge, 2012.
  10. Bardhan, Indranil R. , Robert J. Kauffman, and Sanjeewa Naranpanawe. "IT project portfolio optimization: a risk management approach to software development governance. " IBM Journal of Research and Development 54. 2 (2010): 2-1.
  11. Borges, Raymond, and Tim Menzies. "Learning to change projects. "Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering. ACM, 2012.
  12. Buse, Raymond PL, and Thomas Zimmermann. "Information needs for software development analytics. " Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Press, 2012.
  13. Cataldo, Marcelo, and Kate Ehrlich. "The Impact of the Structure of Communication Patterns in Global Software Development: An Empirical Analysis of a Project Using Agile Methods. " Institute for Software Research, Carnegie Mellon University (2011).
  14. Saaty, Thomas L. , and Luis G. Vargas. "How to Make a Decision. " Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer US, 2012. 1-21.
  15. Fichman, Robert G. , and Chris F. Kemerer. "Adoption of software engineering process innovations: The case of objectorientation. " Sloan management review34. 2 (2012).
  16. Paasivaara, Maria, and Casper Lassenius. "How does an agile coaching team work?: a case study. " Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process. ACM, 2011.
  17. Lpez, Cristina, and Jose L. Salmeron. "Risks Response Strategies for Supporting Practitioners Decision-Making in Software Projects. " Procedia Technology 5 (2012): 437-444.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Global software engineering Requirement analysis Software development Requirement risk management