We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Social Commerce Hybrid Product Recommender

by Rahul Hooda, Kulvinder Singh, Sanjeev Dhawan
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 100 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Rahul Hooda, Kulvinder Singh, Sanjeev Dhawan
10.5120/17581-8419

Rahul Hooda, Kulvinder Singh, Sanjeev Dhawan . Social Commerce Hybrid Product Recommender. International Journal of Computer Applications. 100, 12 ( August 2014), 43-49. DOI=10.5120/17581-8419

@article{ 10.5120/17581-8419,
author = { Rahul Hooda, Kulvinder Singh, Sanjeev Dhawan },
title = { Social Commerce Hybrid Product Recommender },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2014 },
volume = { 100 },
number = { 12 },
month = { August },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 43-49 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume100/number12/17581-8419/ },
doi = { 10.5120/17581-8419 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:29:49.439578+05:30
%A Rahul Hooda
%A Kulvinder Singh
%A Sanjeev Dhawan
%T Social Commerce Hybrid Product Recommender
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 100
%N 12
%P 43-49
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The vision for Web 3. 0 (also known as Semantic Web) is the ability to create meaning out of huge quantity of qualitative data. Existing data can be interconnected for further uses. Web 2. 0 focused on the users interaction with others whereas Web 3. 0 focus more on the users themselves. The advantages of Semantic Web and E-commerce give rise to social commerce (also referred as f-commerce). The future of business lies on the "social" factor and it is this factor which gives rise to a new kind of connected consumers who are becoming influential in their own right. This paper explores a very specific instance of Semantic Web – Social Recommender System. This paper discusses the likelihood of converting social data into quantitative information and using this information to power social recommendations. This paper first outlines the benefits of social commerce over e-commerce platform. Then the related literature work regarding hybrid recommenders is discussed. Next it is discussed how to predict ratings from a user-item rating network and friend's network and then how to unify similarity matrices obtained from different networks. And lastly this paper covers the social hybrid product recommender algorithm and its experimental evaluations to predict its efficiency.

References
  1. Konstan, J. A. , B. N. Miller, D. Maltz, J. L. Herlocker, L. R. Gordon, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 77-87, 1997.
  2. Resnick, P. , N. Iakovou, M. Sushak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175- 186, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  3. Sarwar B. , G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative ?ltering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of WWW Conference, pp. 285–295, 2001.
  4. Karypis G. Evaluation of item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. In Proc. ACM CIKM Conf. , pp. 247–254, 2001.
  5. Billsus, D. & M. Pazzani. A Hybrid User Model for News Story Classification. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on User Modelling, pp. 99-108, Banff, Canada, 1999.
  6. Billsus, D. and M. Pazzani. User modeling for adaptive news access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 10, no. 2-3, pp. 147-180, Kluwer Academic Publishers Hingham, MA, USA, 2000.
  7. Tran, T. and R. Cohen. Hybrid Recommender Systems for Electronic Commerce. In Knowledge-Based Electronic Markets, Papers from AAAI Workshop, Technical Report WS-00-04, pp. 78-83, AAAI Press, 2000.
  8. Pazzani, M. A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 13. No. 5-6, pp. 393-408, December 1999.
  9. Balabanovic, M. and Y. Shoham. Fab: Content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 66-72, 1997.
  10. Basu, C. , H. Hirsh, and W. Cohen. Recommendation as classification: Using social and content-based information in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'98), pp. 714- 720, Madison, Wis, USA, July 1998.
  11. Popescul, A. , L. H. Ungar, D. M. Pennock, and S. Lawrence. Probabilistic Models for Unified Collaborative and Content-Based Recommendation in Sparse-Data Environments. In Proceedings of the 17th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'01), pp. 437- 444, Seattle, WA, 2001.
  12. Schein, A. I. , A. Popescul, L. H. Ungar, and D. M. Pennock. Methods and Metrics for cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research andDevelopment in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '02), pp. 253-260, ACM press, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  13. Melville, P. , R. J. Mooney, and R. Nagarajan. Content-Boosted Collaborative Filtering for Improved Recommendations. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, pp. 187-192, AAAI press, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2002.
  14. Soboroff, I. and C. Nicholas. Combining content and collaboration in text filtering. In 43 IJCAI'99 Workshop: Machine Learning for Information Filtering, Stockholm, Sweden, August 1999.
  15. J. Golbeck. Personalizing applications through integration of inferred trust values in semantic web-based social networks. In Proceedings of Semantic Network Analysis Workshop at the 4th International Semantic Web Conf. , 2005.
  16. Massa, P. & P. Avesani. Trust-aware collaborative ?ltering for recommender systems. In Proceedings of Federated International Conference on The Move to Meaningful Internet: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, pages 492–508, 2004.
  17. Jamali, M. & M. Ester. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. In Proceedings of 4th ACM RecSys Conference, pages 135–142, 2010.
  18. He, J. & W. Chu. A Social Network-Based Recommender System (SNRS). In Annals of Information Systems, Special Issue on Data Mining for Social Network Data, Vol. 12, pages 44–74, 2010.
  19. McPherson, M. , M. Smith-Lovin & J. M Cook. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. In Annual Review of Sociology, vol 27, pp. 415-444, 2001.
  20. Symeonidis, P. , E. Tiakas and Y. Manolopoulos. Product Recommendation & Rating Prediction based on Multi-modal Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Recommender systems, pp. 61-68, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  21. L. Dice. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3,1945.
  22. W. E. Winkler. String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 354–359, 1990.
  23. Smith, F. T. & S. M. Waterman. Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences. Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 147, pp. 195–197, 1981.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Social commerce hybrid product recommender f-commerce homophily Cosine similarity Smith Waterman string similarity measure unipartite graph bipartite graph