CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Context Sensitive Information Retrieval of Social Networking Sites: A Survey

by D. I. George Amalarethinam, V. Jude Nirmal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 100 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: D. I. George Amalarethinam, V. Jude Nirmal
10.5120/17565-8194

D. I. George Amalarethinam, V. Jude Nirmal . Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Context Sensitive Information Retrieval of Social Networking Sites: A Survey. International Journal of Computer Applications. 100, 10 ( August 2014), 47-58. DOI=10.5120/17565-8194

@article{ 10.5120/17565-8194,
author = { D. I. George Amalarethinam, V. Jude Nirmal },
title = { Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Context Sensitive Information Retrieval of Social Networking Sites: A Survey },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2014 },
volume = { 100 },
number = { 10 },
month = { August },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 47-58 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume100/number10/17565-8194/ },
doi = { 10.5120/17565-8194 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:29:39.411117+05:30
%A D. I. George Amalarethinam
%A V. Jude Nirmal
%T Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Context Sensitive Information Retrieval of Social Networking Sites: A Survey
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 100
%N 10
%P 47-58
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Context Sensitive Information Retrieval (CSIR) is quite a challenging issue because of the complexities involved in the process from semantics and ontology to the huge amount of processing capacity required to make it possible in real time. Understanding the semantic gap (where context is neglected) plays a major role in elimination false positives and improving the true positives in the information retrieval process. With big data becoming ubiquitous due to the volume, velocity and variety of data being presented and analysed in almost all the domains today, context sensitive analysis and interpretation of big data becomes important. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the existing techniques for big data analysis based on massively parallel processing techniques like GPGPUs (CUDA), Hadoop Map-Reduce and also Data Warehousing. This paper presents a discussion about the datasets that are available for research and also the applications that could be thought of by context sensitive analysis of social media data. Also this paper provides research directions for context sensitive information retrieval and sentiment analysis in big data based on massively parallel processing architecture.

References
  1. Shen, Xuehua, Bin Tan, and ChengXiangZhai. 2005. Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback. Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM.
  2. Gracia, Jorge, et al. 2012. Challenges for the multilingual Web of Data. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 11- 63-71.
  3. Turney, Peter D. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Pang, Bo, Lillian Lee, and ShivakumarVaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Loia, Vincenzo, and Sabrina Senatore. 2013. A fuzzy-oriented sentic analysis to capture the human emotion in Web-based content. Knowledge-Based Systems.
  6. Ghazi, Diman, Diana Inkpen, and Stan Szpakowicz. 2014. Prior and contextual emotion of words in sentential context. Computer Speech & Language 28. 1: 76-92.
  7. Li, Yung-Ming, Chun-Te Wu, and Cheng-Yang Lai. 2013. A social recommender mechanism for e-commerce: Combining similarity, trust, and relationship. Decision Support Systems 55. 3:740-752.
  8. Wang, Gang, et al. 2014. Sentiment classification: The contribution of ensemble learning. Decision Support Systems 57: 77-93.
  9. Wijnhoven, Fons, and Oscar Bloemen. 2013. External validity of sentiment mining reports: Can current methods identify demographic biases, event biases, and manipulation of reviews?. Decision Support Systems.
  10. Lei, Jingsheng, et al. 2014. Towards building a social emotion detection system for online news. Future Generation Computer Systems.
  11. Mohammad, Saif M. 2012. From once upon a time to happily ever after: Tracking emotions in mail and books. Decision Support Systems 53. 4: 730-741.
  12. Bradbury, Danny. 2011. Data mining with Linkedin. Computer Fraud & Security2011. 10: 5-8.
  13. Montejo-Ráez, Arturo, et al. 2014. Ranked WordNet graph for Sentiment Polarity Classification in Twitter. Computer Speech & Language 28. 1: 93-107.
  14. Lee, Anthony JT, et al. 2013. Discovering content-based behavioral roles in social networks. Decision Support Systems.
  15. Khan, Farhan Hassan, Saba Bashir, and UsmanQamar. 2013. TOM: Twitter opinion mining framework using hybrid classification scheme. Decision Support Systems.
  16. Nettleton, David F. 2013. Data mining of social networks represented as graphs. Computer Science Review 7: 1-34.
  17. Ortigosa, Alvaro, Rosa M. Carro, and José Ignacio Quiroga. 2014. Predicting user personality by mining social interactions in Facebook. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 80. 1: 57-71.
  18. Upadhyaya, Sujatha R. 2013. Parallel approaches to machine learning—A comprehensive survey. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 73. 3: 284-292.
  19. Jung, Jason J. 2012. Online named entity recognition method for microtexts in social networking services: A case study of twitter. Expert Systems with Applications39. 9: 8066-8070.
  20. Zhou, Jingyu, Yunlong Zhang, and Jia Cheng. 2014. Preference-based mining of top-K influential nodes in social networks. Future Generation Computer Systems31: 40-47.
  21. Kajdanowicz, Tomasz, PrzemyslawKazienko, and WojciechIndyk. 2014. Parallel processing of large graphs. Future Generation Computer Systems 32: 324-337.
  22. KamelBoulos, Maged N. , et al. 2010. Social Web mining and exploitation for serious applications: Technosocial Predictive Analytics and related technologies for public health, environmental and national security surveillance. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 100. 1: 16-23.
  23. Jang, Haeng-Jin, et al. 2013. Deep sentiment analysis: Mining the causality between personality-value-attitude for analyzing business ads in social media. Expert Systems with Applications 40. 18: 7492-7503.
  24. Huang, Jing, et al. 2013. Decentralized mining social network communities with agents. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 57. 11: 2998-3008.
  25. He, Qing, et al. 2011. A parallel incremental extreme SVM classifier. Neurocomputing 74. 16: 2532-2540.
  26. Lobachev, Oleg, Michael Guthe, and Rita Loogen. 2013. Estimating parallel performance. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 73. 6: 876-887.
  27. http://snap. stanford. edu/data/index. html
  28. http://www. nvidia. in/object/cuda_home_new. html
  29. Karloff, Howard, SiddharthSuri, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2010. A model of computation for MapReduce. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  30. Fadika, Zacharia, et al. 2013. MARIANE: Using MApReduce in HPC environments. Future Generation Computer Systems.
  31. www. wikipedia. org
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Context Sensitive Information Retrieval Sentiment Analysis Emotion Analysis CUDA Hadoop Parallel mining