CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Mining Feedbacks and Opinions in Educational Environments

by Rajkumar Kannan, Maria Bielikova
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Rajkumar Kannan, Maria Bielikova
10.5120/225-376

Rajkumar Kannan, Maria Bielikova . Mining Feedbacks and Opinions in Educational Environments. International Journal of Computer Applications. 1, 10 ( February 2010), 33-36. DOI=10.5120/225-376

@article{ 10.5120/225-376,
author = { Rajkumar Kannan, Maria Bielikova },
title = { Mining Feedbacks and Opinions in Educational Environments },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2010 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 10 },
month = { February },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 33-36 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume1/number10/225-376/ },
doi = { 10.5120/225-376 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:45:43.744855+05:30
%A Rajkumar Kannan
%A Maria Bielikova
%T Mining Feedbacks and Opinions in Educational Environments
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 1
%N 10
%P 33-36
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

People, such as students, employees and public, are talking about the institution and its business everyday positively or negatively by means of feedbacks, opinions, comments etc through various social platforms. Their feedbacks and opinions are valuable resources for the institution if listened properly. Since feedbacks are by and large unstructured in nature, understanding and extracting the meaningful information from massive data collections becomes a real challenge. This paper outlines the various tasks that are to be carried out during the knowledge discovery process from the learning environments setting.

References
  1. Spangler, S and Kreulen, J (2002). Interactive methods for taxonomy editing and validation, Proc. of ACM CIKM 2002.
  2. M. Hm and B. Liu (2004). Mining opinion features in customer reviews. Proc. of AAAI'04. 755-760.
  3. S. Kim and E. Hovy (2004). Determining the sentiment of opinions. Proc. of Intl. Conf. On Computational Linguistics (COLING'04).
  4. J. Weibe and R. Riloff (2005). Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from un-annotated texts. Proc. of CICLing. 486-497.
  5. TheresaWilson, Paul Hoffmann, Swapna Somasundaran, Jason Kessler, JanyceWiebe, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, Ellen Riloff, Siddharth Patwardha. OpinionFinder: A system for subjectivity analysis, Proc. of. HLT/EMNLP 2005. 34-35.
  6. Yejin Choi, Eric Breck, and Claire Cardie (2006). Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations for Opinion Recognition. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processiong (EMNLP-2006).
  7. Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, Ellen Riloff, and Siddharth Patwardhan (2005). Identifying Sources of Opinions with Conditional Random Fields and Extraction Patterns. Proc. of Human Language Technology Conf./Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), Vancouver, Canada.
  8. Ellen Riloff (1996). Automatically Generating Extraction Patterns from Untagged Text. Proc. of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96). 1044-1049.
  9. Ellen Riloff and Janyce Wiebe (2003). Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expressions. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-03). ACL SIGDAT. 105-112.
  10. Ellen Riloff, Janyce Wiebe, and Theresa Wilson (2003). Learning Subjective Nouns Using Extraction Pattern Bootstrapping. Seventh Conf. on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-03). ACL SIGNLL.
  11. Robert E. Schapire and Yoram Singer. BoosTexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learning, 39(2/3): 135-168, 2000.
  12. Janyce Wiebe (2002). Instructions for Annotating Opinions in Newspaper Articles. Department of Computer Science Tech. Report TR-02-101, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  13. Janyce Wiebe and Ellen Riloff (2005). Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotated texts. Sixth Int. Conf. on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-2005).
  14. Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie (2005). Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, volume 39, issue 2-3, pp. 165-210.
  15. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe and Paul Hoffmann (2005). Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis. Proc. of Human Language Technologies Conf./Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), Vancouver, Canada.
  16. Yejin Choi, and Claire Cardie (2007). Identifying Expressions of Opinion in Context. Eric Breck,. Twentieth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2683-2688 .
  17. Veselin Stoyanov and Claire Cardie (2006). Partially Supervised Coreference Resolution for Opinion Summarization through Structured Rule Learning.. Proc. of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2006. 336-344.
  18. Veselin Stoyanov and Claire Cardie (2006). Toward Opinion Summarization: Linking the Sources. COLING-ACL'06 Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, 2006. 9 14.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Feedback and Opinions Knowledge Discovery Learning Environments

Powered by PhDFocusTM