CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Article:Dependency based Process Model for Impact Analysis: A Requirement Engineering Perspective

by Chetna Gupta, Yogesh Singh, Durg Singh Chauhan
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 6 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Chetna Gupta, Yogesh Singh, Durg Singh Chauhan
10.5120/1079-1410

Chetna Gupta, Yogesh Singh, Durg Singh Chauhan . Article:Dependency based Process Model for Impact Analysis: A Requirement Engineering Perspective. International Journal of Computer Applications. 6, 6 ( September 2010), 28-30. DOI=10.5120/1079-1410

@article{ 10.5120/1079-1410,
author = { Chetna Gupta, Yogesh Singh, Durg Singh Chauhan },
title = { Article:Dependency based Process Model for Impact Analysis: A Requirement Engineering Perspective },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2010 },
volume = { 6 },
number = { 6 },
month = { September },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 28-30 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume6/number6/1079-1410/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1079-1410 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:54:44.916979+05:30
%A Chetna Gupta
%A Yogesh Singh
%A Durg Singh Chauhan
%T Article:Dependency based Process Model for Impact Analysis: A Requirement Engineering Perspective
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 6
%N 6
%P 28-30
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Changing requirements of customer needs establishes the need to analyze impact of requirement changes. For success of any software requirement analysis is very essential. In this paper, we propose a four stage method engineering process which aims at estimating impact of change. The process model described is a linear layered model. Impact sets are computed by analyzing dependency tractability relations with other connected method components. The results produced provide two type of information (a) added, deleted, modified methods (b) depth (extent) of impact on the system.

References
  1. Ajila, S., 1995. Software maintenance: An approach to impact analysis of object change. Software - Practice and Experience.
  2. Albinet, A., Boulanger, J.L., Dubois, H., Peraldi-Frati, M.A., Sorel, Y., Van, Q.D., 2007. Model-Based Methodology for Requirements Traceability in Embedded Systems. ECMDA TW 2007 Proceedings, Haifa.
  3. Cleland-Huang, J., Chang C.K., Christensen M., 2003. Event-Based Traceability for Managing Evolutionary Change. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
  4. G. Grosz, C. Rolland, S. Schwer, C. Souveyet, V. Plihon, S. Si-Said, C. Ben Achour and C. Gnaho, 1997. Modelling and Engineering the Requirements Engineering Process: An Overview of the NATURE Approach, Requirement engineering Journal.
  5. Harmsen F., Brinkkemper S., Han J.L.O., 1994. Situational Method Engineering for Information System Project Approaches,. Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle. Elsevier Science Inc.
  6. Heaven, W., Finkelstein, A., 2004. UML Profile to Support Requirements Engineering with KAOS. IEE Proceedings – Software.
  7. Law, J., Rothermel, G., 2003. Whole program path-based dynamic impact analysis. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE`03).
  8. Lindvall, M., Sandahl, K., 1998. Traceability aspects of impact analysis in object-oriented systems. Software Maintenance: Research and Practice.
  9. Luqi: A, 1990. Graph Model for Software Evolution. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
  10. Maletec, J.I., Collard, M.L., Simoes, B., 2005. An XML based Approach to Support the Evolution of Model-to-Model Traceability Links. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering.
  11. Naveen Prakash, Maneeesha Srivastav, Chetna Gupta, Vipin Arora, 2007. An intention driven method engineering approach", First International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).
  12. Phillip A. Laplante, 2007. What Every Engineer Should Know about Software Engineering.
  13. Prakash N., 1999. Towards a Formal Definition of Methods, Requirements Engineering Journal, Springer.
  14. Prakash Naveen, 2006. On Generic Method Models, Requirements Engineering Journal.
  15. Ramesh, B., Jarke, M., 2007. Toward Reference Models for Requirements Traceability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
  16. Reshef, N. A., Paige, R. F., Rubin J., Shaham-Gafni Y., Kolovos D.S., 2005. Operational Semantics for Traceability. ECMDA TW 2005 Proceedings.
  17. Supakkul, S., Chung, L., 2005. A UML Profile for Goal-Oriented and Use Case-Driven Representation of NFRs and FRs. SERA'05.
  18. Van Gorph, P., Altheide, F., Janssens, D., 2006. Traceability and Fine-Grained Constraints in Interactive Inconsistency Management. ECMDA TW 2006 Proceedings, Bilbao.
  19. Van Lamswerdee, A., 2001. Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Roundtrip from Research to Practice. Invited Minitutorial, Proceedings RE'01 - 5th International Symposium Requirements Engineering.
  20. Vicente-Chicote, C., Moros, B., Toval, A., 2007. REMM-Studio: an Integrated Model-Driven Environment for Requirements Specification, Validation and Formatting. In Journal of Object Technology, Special Issue TOOLS Europe.
  21. Walderhaug, S., Johansen, U., Stav, E., 2006. Towards a Generic Solution for Traceability in MDD. ECMDA TW 2006 Proceedings, Bilbao.
  22. Zhao, J., Yang, H., Xiang, L., Xu, B., 2002. Change impact analysis to support architectural evolution. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Change impact analysis Method Method engineering Requirements traceability Situational method engineering Software testing