CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Traffic Pattern based Performance Comparison of Two Proactive MANET Routing Protocols using Manhattan Grid Mobility Model

by Sunil Kr. Maakar, Yudhvir Singh
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 114 - Number 14
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Sunil Kr. Maakar, Yudhvir Singh
10.5120/20048-2096

Sunil Kr. Maakar, Yudhvir Singh . Traffic Pattern based Performance Comparison of Two Proactive MANET Routing Protocols using Manhattan Grid Mobility Model. International Journal of Computer Applications. 114, 14 ( March 2015), 26-31. DOI=10.5120/20048-2096

@article{ 10.5120/20048-2096,
author = { Sunil Kr. Maakar, Yudhvir Singh },
title = { Traffic Pattern based Performance Comparison of Two Proactive MANET Routing Protocols using Manhattan Grid Mobility Model },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2015 },
volume = { 114 },
number = { 14 },
month = { March },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume114/number14/20048-2096/ },
doi = { 10.5120/20048-2096 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:52:47.932771+05:30
%A Sunil Kr. Maakar
%A Yudhvir Singh
%T Traffic Pattern based Performance Comparison of Two Proactive MANET Routing Protocols using Manhattan Grid Mobility Model
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 114
%N 14
%P 26-31
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile hosts forming a temporary network without the aid of any stand-alone infrastructure or centralized administration. Mobile Ad-hoc networks are self-organizing and self configuring multihop wireless networks where, the structure of the network changes dynamically. This is mainly due to the mobility of the nodes. In the current study we have compared the performance of three MANET routing protocols AODV as reactive, DSDV and OLSR as proactive by using Manhattan Grid mobility model. These share some similar behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance difference. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network load, mobility and type of traffic (CBR and TCP). Manhattan Grid Mobility model has been generated by IMPORTANT (Impact of Mobility Patterns on Routing in Ad-hoc NeTwork) tool. A detailed simulation has been carried out in NS2. The metrics used for performance analysis are Packet Delivery Fraction, Average end-toend Delay, Packet Loss, Routing Overhead, Normalized Routing Load and throughput. It has been observed that AODV (reactive) protocol performs better in CBR traffic and in case of real time delivery of packets but at cost of higher routing overhead. But in TCP traffic, proactive routing protocol OLSR gives better result. Overall performance of routing protocols in TCP traffic is much better than CBR traffic.

References
  1. S. Das, C. E. Perkins, E. Royer, "Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing", IETF Draft, June 2002.
  2. C-K Toh "Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Protocols and Systems", First Edition, Prentice Hall Inc, USA, 2002.
  3. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer, "Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing", Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, USA, pages 90-100, February 1999.
  4. Elizabeth M. Royer and Chai-Keong Toh, "A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks", IEEE Personal Communications, pages 46-55, April 1999.
  5. UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator, http://wwwmash. cs. berkeley. edu/ns/, referred on January 2015.
  6. "The Network Simulator - ns-2," available at http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ns/ , referred on January 2015.
  7. Fan Bai, Ahmed Helmy "A Framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks", IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
  8. Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng, Vanessa Davies "A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research", Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC): vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002.
  9. Perkins Charles E, Bhagwat Pravin, "Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers", In SIGCOMM UK, pp. 234-244, 1994.
  10. Suresh Kumar, R. K. Rathy and Diwakar Pandey, "Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks using NS2", 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2009.
  11. T. H. Clausen and P. Jacquet, "Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)", RFC 3626, October 2003.
  12. S. Corson and J. Macker, "Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation considerations", RFC2501, IETF Network Working Group, January 1999.
  13. S. R. Biradar, Hiren H D Sharma, Kalpana Shrama and Subir Kumar Sarkar, "Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANETs using Group Mobility Model", IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, pages 192-195 2011.
  14. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, quet, "Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing", RFC 3561, July 2003.
  15. N. Aschenbruck,E. Gerhands-Padilla, ,P. Martini,"A Survey on mobility models for Performance analysis in Tactical Mobile networks," Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technology,Vol. 2 pp. 54-61,2011.
  16. X. Hong, M. Gerla, G. Pei, and C. -C. Chiang, "A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks," in ACM/IEEE MSWiM, August 1999.
  17. http://www-scf. usc. edu/~fbai/important/, referred on February 2015.
  18. http://nile. usc. edu/important/, referred on February 2015.
  19. G. Jayakumar and G. Gopinath "Performance Comparison of MANET Protocols Based on Manhattan Grid Mobility Model", Journal of Mobile Communication 2(1) 18-26, 2008.
  20. Nor Surayati Mohamad Usop, Azizol Abdula and Ahmad "Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR Routing Protocol in Grid Environment", IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL. 9 No. 7, July 2012.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET Routing Protocol IMPORTANT TCP CBR Manhattan Grid Mobility Model Performance Metrics

Powered by PhDFocusTM